Continuity Inquiry · Dynastic authentication pathway
Modern claim-origin cohort — atlas of admitted persons and the one admitted relationship
Five nineteenth-century historical persons named as principals in the disputed 1878 St Petersburg recognition of the Calfa brothers as Lusignan. Admitted at person-level identity only; the 1878 recognition instrument itself remains unrecovered at tier-1 depth and is not affirmed by this atlas.
Focus: Théodore-Charles Meyer
Connected to focus
1 of 5 persons
Focus stands alone in the connected group — no other cohort person has an admitted relationship to Théodore-Charles Meyer at tier-1 depth.
In scope, no admitted relationship to focus
4 of 5 persons
These persons are canonically admitted in the same fixture — they were named as principals in the 1878 event — but no relationship connects them to Théodore-Charles Meyer at tier-1 depth. Absence of an admitted edge is not evidence against a historical connection; it is the discipline of the Continuity Inquiry framework.
- Baron Alexandre Jomini 1814–1888 Open Person Room Re-orient atlas around this person
- Ambroise Calfa 1826–1906 Open Person Room Re-orient atlas around this person
- Khoren Nar Bey c. 1831–1892 Open Person Room Re-orient atlas around this person
- Louis Christian de Lusignan 1807–1884 Open Person Room Re-orient atlas around this person
Admitted connections in the cohort
1 admitted at tier-1 depth
- Ambroise Calfa — Khoren Nar Bey sibling Admitted edge between two persons currently in the unconnected-to-focus group.
References
- Public / shareable view — the Lusignan Corpus The single URL curated for sharing with the Royal House of Lusignan or in general: all three admissions, the audit's grading framework, and the open research targets.
- Continuity Inquiry — modern claim-origin cohort section The cohort as introduced under the Dynastic authentication pathway on the Continuity Inquiry surface.
- Pre-1878 British Nar Bey — Joseph and Annie Elizabeth (1871 Chancery) Governance-independent canonical admission of two persons named in TNA C 16/693/A113. Documents pre-1878 British use of the Nar Bey princely styling; biological-brother relation to Ambroise or Khoren is `possible`, held open at tier-1 pending the Kew bill and independent evidence linking the London 1871 Nar Beys to the Paris Calfa family.
- Research targets — what to order next Consolidated register of open research targets across the Lusignan modern claim-origin arc and the pre-1878 British Nar Bey admission. Each target names the specific action, what grade it would advance, and the expected cost.
- Continuity evidence map — September 2026 RHL audit Tier-1 Movement-2/3 audit of the Royal House of Lusignan Historical Evidence Programme’s September 2026 update, with graded confidence per claim.